Review of Resumes Is Most Valid When the Content of the Resumes Is Evaluated in Terms of the
Why would we ever want to employ something like social media profiles to inform selection decisions when there are much much more than authentic means to evaluate applicant skills and fit? One reason, we idea, might be due to the overwhelming number and type of selection tests bachelor. The purpose of this article is to help deal with that clutter past presenting three of the well-nigh constructive and universal employee selection tools forth with the outcomes and specific requirements that you lot can expect when implementing each. Although no method will ever exist without drawbacks, the key is to detect the i that best fits your hiring strategy and can most easily be aligned with your existing processes and procedures.
The of the almost effective, valid methods of employee selection will be described below in detail. They include:
- Full general Mental Ability
- Structured Interviews
- Situational Judgment Tests
1. GENERAL MENTAL Power (GMA)
GMA (a.k.a., cerebral ability or g) is possibly the single most constructive tool for selection. In fact, this arroyo is constructive at predicting time to come performance in every blazon of job, at all job levels (from entry-level to CEO) and in every industry. GMA can exist assessed in a variety of ways, from thirty minute newspaper and pencil tests similar the Wonderlic, to more expensive online computer adaptive tests. Both computer and paper & pencil tests are every bit valid, assuasive organizations to select the approach that fits best.
OUTCOMES | REQUIREMENTS |
|
The furnishings of adverse impact tin can be mitigated in several means:
|
Boosted Information on GMA:
- Article. Render-on-Investment of using GMA as an employee selection method
ii. STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS
These are not your standard interviews that kickoff with "So tell me about yourself…" In structured or behaviorally-based interviews, applicants are asked a series of specific, predetermined, chore-related questions while their responses are scored using detailed criteria (often presented in a scoring guide that provides detailed descriptions on what constitutes each rating). An "interview panel" approach is often used, where ii-three trained managers ask the questions and score each response separately. Later the interview, their ratings are compared to make up one's mind the consistency or interrater reliability. When responses are scored inconsistently, interviewers talk over their rationale and come to consensus.
OUTCOMES | REQUIREMENTS |
|
|
Additional Information on Structured Interviews:
- Article. Adding Structure to Unstructured Interviews
- Reference Guide. A guide to Structured Interviews (.pdf guide from US Bureau of Human Resources)
3. SITUATIONAL JUDGMENT TESTS (SJT)
These tests accept been described as the multiple-choice equivalent to structured interviews. In SJTs, applicants are asked to cull how they would respond to a variety of hypothetical situations that are relevant to the target job. Results indicate how that particular bidder volition comport when faced with item situations and decisions. The ability of this method to predict how applicants will respond to complicated decisions makes SJTs one of the best approaches for managerial and technical positions.
OUTCOMES | REQUIREMENTS |
|
|
WHAT ABOUT COMBINING THESE METHODS?
Aye! Information technology is of import to note that combining more than ane instrument or method can profoundly improve the predictive validity of your hiring process. For example, combining GMA tests with structured interviews will exist much more effective than using either of them lone. Likewise, using any of these iii methods would be improve than evaluating applicant resumes and giving unstructured interviews or non-validated off-the-shelf tests.
CONCLUSION
There are countless tools, methods, and approaches to making proficient selection decisions. However, according to decades of practical organizational research the ones described in a higher place are the virtually successful, accessible methods for finding those diamonds in the rough. Information technology is important to annotation that other valid methods were intentionally left out: Assessment Centers were non described considering they are not a realistic arroyo for many jobs and organizations.
We have designed, adult, and validated selection processes for numerous public and individual clients over the years. To leave yous, reader, with a concluding thought, we accept found that when job analyses are used a foundation to develop (or select appropriate off-the-shelf) choice tests, they pay off big in terms of improved functioning, productivity, environs, and retention.
– Scontrino-Powell
References:
-
Christian, Thou. S., Edwards, B. D., & Bradley, J. C. (2010). Situational judgment tests: Constructs assessed and a meta-analysis of their criterion-related validities. Personnel Psychology, 63, 83-117.
-
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J.E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Applied and theoretical implications of 85 years of enquiry findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
-
Gatewood, R. D., Feild, H. S., & Barrick, M. (2011). Human being Resources Pick (7th ed.), South-Western Publishing.
Employee Selection and Assessment , Strengthening Organizations
Personality and Job Operation
Over the by couple of decades, personality has get a focal point in organizational inquiry, leadership development and derailment, and especially
joyalsarronever78.blogspot.com
Source: https://scontrino-powell.com/blog/effective-employee-selection-methods
0 Response to "Review of Resumes Is Most Valid When the Content of the Resumes Is Evaluated in Terms of the"
Post a Comment